Sample weekly report — REAL data, pulled 2026-07-18

AI Visibility: calendly.com vs cal.com · acuityscheduling.com

Platform: ChatGPT · trailing index through 2026-06. This is an actual pull from our data pipeline — the same CiteWatch report subscribers get weekly, with deltas.

Mention share

DomainMentionsAI ask volumeShare
calendly.com12535
cal.com11509
acuityscheduling.com10496

Read: a three-way knife fight — calendly.com leads on mentions (12 vs 11 vs 10) but the open-source competitor is one mention behind and wins the highest-intent recommendation question (below). Category leadership in AI answers is NOT settled by brand size.

The questions people ask AI (and who wins each)

“is calendly actually free?”

317/mo AI asks

12-month AI ask volume

ChatGPT answers YES and cites calendly.com/pricing directly — the brand controls this answer.

Answer currently favors: calendly.com

“what is the best free appointment scheduling app?”

285/mo AI asks

12-month AI ask volume

ChatGPT recommends Cal.com FIRST ('unusually generous free plan, open-source'), Calendly second for 'easiest setup'. Third-party comparison sites (sasanova, talkspresso) are the cited evidence — not either brand's own site. Volume is up 6.6× year-over-year.

Answer currently favors: cal.com

“is calendly still free?”

188/mo AI asks

12-month AI ask volume

A brand-doubt question growing from ~0 to 188/mo in a year — usually triggered by pricing-change chatter. Calendly's own pricing page holds the citation.

Answer currently favors: calendly.com

Who AI cites when talking about this category

Cited sourceCitations
techradar.com5
squareup.com4
microsoft.com4
schedulingkit.com4
reddit.com3
doodle.com3

The actionable part: third-party comparison sites (techradar, schedulingkit) and Reddit carry the recommendation questions. If you're calendly.com, your pricing page defends the brand questions — but the "best free app" verdict is being decided on pages you don't control. That's where the next move is.